|
C O U R S E L E C T U R E Changes in Capitalism between the Wars Notes taken on August 27, 2019 by Edward Tanguay |
the First World War brought the competing imperial systems, tension, and disequilibrium to a head
the peace of 1918/19 didn't create a durable peace as its architects sought out
the tension would persist until well into 1945
a Thirty Years War with pauses and truces throughout
especially when you look at Asia during this period, war was much more common than peace
this epic of world history brought the old Imperial systems' contentions to a head with a human toll that the planet had never seen and which we would never see again
during this time came a crack in the economic system
aggravated the tensions that lurked in the wake of the so-called peace
collapse of financial, commercial and the first age of real globalization
took highly highly integrated global arrangement and fractured it
it took just a few short years to break this down
a village will produce for its own consumption
but what happens over the centuries when you separate production from consumption
the 19th century was the high water mark, never had we seen such a separation between the two
some countries produced manufactured goods (Britain), and some produce primary staples (India)
transcends national boundaries
each country is specializing
to protect their own jobs, each unit breaks the bonds
people became disillusioned with the orthodoxies of liberal economics
goes through a kind of transformation as a result of watching this happen
the completely free marketplace was no longer a reality for healthy economics
there was a turn away from the liberal formula
by 1937, we start to see a slow recovery
what eventually brought the world out of the economy tailspin were the demands of the wartime economy
public policy experiments
states were faster than markets
capitalist, communist and colonial economies relied on the state as an engine
the depression had locked itself into a steady state
the command economies did better
didn't just put money in pockets
state took over production itself
this was new in the global economy for a state to play such an aggressive role
all societies became mass societies
experiencing pressure on the part of civilians to recovery
mass production societies
his workers should be able to afford an automobile
they can be the consumers of what they produce
a conceptual breakthrough
recombine production and consumption
paradox of modern capitalism
while it created more integration, it created more volatility
put pressure on states to integrate societies vertically
resolving these problems was the challenge of the 1930s