EDWARD'S LECTURE NOTES:
More notes at http://tanguay.info/learntracker
C O U R S E 
Key Constitutional Concepts and Supreme Court Cases
Professor Kermit Roosevelt, III, University of Pennsylvania
https://www.coursera.org/course/constitution
C O U R S E   L E C T U R E 
The Bill of Rights
Notes taken on December 6, 2014 by Edward Tanguay
•
Constitution was written in 1787 and ratified in 1788
•
but that Constitution, the Founders constitution, isn't the one we live under today
•
in part because of Supreme Court decisions on amendments
•
how judges should apply old constitutional provisions to modern circumstances is a difficult question
•
the words of the Constitution are changed through amendments
•
our history with amendments has not been one of slow and steady change, but bursts of activity, such as these three:
•
1. The Bill of Rights
•
the first 10 amendments
•
2. The Reconstruction Amendments
•
followed the Civil War
•
3. The Progressive Era Amendments
•
Bill of Rights
•
the original Constitution was missing what we often think about most when we think of the Constitution: individual rights
•
the original constitution has some protections for individuals
•
government cannot create ex post facto laws
•
no bills of attainder
•
declaring someone guilty of a crime while denying that person due process of law
•
but these are limited
•
lack of protections for individual was not because people were not concerned about them
•
the Americans had fought a war arguing that their rights as Englishmen had been taken away
•
the reason the Constitutional Convention didn't add a set of individual rights to the original Constitution is a bit mundane
•
they were getting homesick
•
they ran out of time
•
every state already had a bill of rights to some degree
•
two groups
•
Federalists
•
George Washington
•
Alexander Hamilton
•
James Madison
•
pro-constitution
•
a strong national government that would have power over the states
•
will protect us from other countries but also from the small-mindedness of state governments
•
make sure that states don't do anything unfair to individuals
•
Anti-Federalists
•
Thomas Jefferson
•
George Mason
•
Patrick Henry
•
argued that we needed a Bill of Rights
•
Federalists responded that government only had limited powers anyway and couldn't invade individual rights
•
other argued that a Bill of Rights would be dangerous
•
the government could claim that individuals had no rights other than the ones listed
•
ratifying the Constitution
•
5 states ratified
•
Massachusetts ratified with the recommendation that a Bill of Rights be added
•
4 of next 5 states do the same
•
so when Constitution does get ratified, the Bill of Rights is one of the first things congress does
•
draft a list of amendments
•
send them out to the states
•
there were twelve
•
two didn't make it
•
the ten that did are now what we call the Bill of Rights
•
to understand the Bill of Rights, you can ask three questions:
•
1. what were the drafters worried about?
•
worried about the federal government
•
worried it would become a tyrant like King George did
•
2. how did they try to protect us?
•
gave government limited powers and divided these powers among the branches of government
•
gave individuals certain rights, this is what the Bill of Rights does
•
protects certain activities against interference from certain actors, usually the government
•
also protected state power
•
the important thing to remember about the Bill of Rights is that is applies only to the federal government
•
the drafters were not worried about what the states would do to their own citizens
•
in their minds, states were good and well-meaning
•
3. how has their solution worked out hundreds of years later?
•
the Framers thought we would have states standing up against the federal government, but instead we have seen individuals stand up against states
•
corrected:
•
admendments
•
amendments
•
Massasschusettes
•
Massachusetts