EDWARD'S LECTURE NOTES:
More notes at http://tanguay.info/learntracker
C O U R S E 
Reason and Persuasion Through Plato's Dialogues
John Holbo, National University of Singapore
https://www.coursera.org/course/reasonandpersuasion
C O U R S E   L E C T U R E 
Alcibiades on Socrates
Notes taken on May 18, 2015 by Edward Tanguay
•
Symposium (Συμπόσιον)
•
a Greek drinking party
•
Plato's Symposium is about giving speeches
•
Alcibiades [al-si-BIGH-i-deez]
•
last famous member of his mother's aristocratic family, the Alcmaeonidae [Ἀλκμαιωνίδαι]
•
gives a speech about how great Socrates is
•
Socrates is a great man, but it's hard to say what makes him great
•
1. you can't compare him to anyone
•
as you can do with great warriors or politician
•
strong as Hercules
•
shrewd as Odysseus
•
wise as Nestor
•
as great a warrior as Achilles
•
but Socrates breaks every mold
•
2. Socrates is annoying in a way that makes him seem incompatible with being great
•
yet you reach a point where no other kind of argument makes since, it's Socrates kind of argument or nothing
•
Socrates is like
•
Silenus
•
a satyr or half divine being that hangs around with Satyrs
•
a favorable comparison
•
handsome Dionysus and Silenus went together
•
often on vases, Silenus on outside, Dionysus on inside, or on either side
•
Marsyas [Μαρσύας]
•
a satyr
•
challenged the god Apollo to a music contest
•
lost, and was flayed for his impudence
•
an unfavorable comparison
•
Socratic arguments are crude by design
•
a feature, not a bug
•
at some point, you realize there is no other kind of argumentation, this is it
•
the argument
•
Euthyphro thinks his father is guilty of murder
•
Socrates answers by asking for the definition of holiness
•
he wants to not know what words mean but what things truly are
•
the difference is not totally clear
•
if it sometimes makes sense to demand precision of definitions, why doesn't it always make sense?
•
at the end Euthyphro runs off
•
Plato ends his dialogue in this unhelpful way
•
suggests Euthyphro hasn't learned anything
•
poses the question: what is the use of Socratic argumentation if it doesn't directly teach people something